discord_trigger_typing

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Show the typing indicator', which implies a non-destructive action but does not explain if it auto-cancels, duration, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it lacks necessary details for a tool with no annotations or schema descriptions. The front-loading is adequate, but the content is insufficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one param, no output schema), the description is minimally complete, but it omits important context like when the indicator stops, whether it conflicts with other actions, or how it relates to sibling tools like send_message.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter channelId has no description in the schema (0% coverage) and the tool description adds no meaning about the parameter (e.g., format, required role, or purpose beyond 'channel').

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The verb 'Show' and resource 'typing indicator' indicate the tool triggers a typing indicator. However, it lacks specificity: does it start or stop? It is not fully clear, and it does not distinguish from sending messages or other actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like sending a message or replying. An explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use statement is missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.