discord_edit_widget_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided; the description carries full burden. It states the basic behavior (enable/disable, set channel) but does not disclose side effects, permissions required, idempotency, or error conditions. For a mutation tool, more behavioral detail is expected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no redundancy. Every word is necessary and directly conveys the tool's purpose. Excellent conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 3 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is minimal. It does not explain return values, error handling, or relationship with sibling tools beyond the basic edit/get pairing. More context would be beneficial for completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%; the description only loosely maps to parameters (enabled, channelId) but does not explain each parameter individually, format, constraints, or required conditions. guildId is required but not mentioned. The description adds minimal value beyond the parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Enable/disable the guild widget and set its invite channel' clearly states the tool's action using specific verbs (enable/disable, set) and resource (guild widget, invite channel). It distinguishes from the sibling discord_get_widget_settings by indicating it is the modification counterpart.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites (e.g., permissions needed), and no explicit when-not-to-use conditions. Usage is implied from the description but lacks explicit context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.