ultratribe-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ultratribe-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceExposes NeuroGraph's scientific API to AI models as MCP tools, enabling them to query, analyze, and visualize brain networks — regions, tracts, connectivity, literature, and cross-species homologies — drawn from a portable SSD-based neuroimaging data library. Lets models read real atlas data, load datasets, compute graph metrics, and produce visualization scene descriptors without acting as the scientific engine itself.122-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceExposes a local-first personal brain to any MCP client, letting agents perform identity-grounded memory recall, simulate stances and value conflicts, propose or approve audited guardrail changes, take snapshots with drift comparison, and run a neural validation harness. Everything runs against a local SQLite neuron/synapse memory graph with consent-gated, append-only auditing.6CC BY-4.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI models to access external services including weather data, file system operations, and SQLite database interactions through a standardized JSON-RPC interface. Features production-ready architecture with security, rate limiting, and comprehensive error handling.365 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to manage space-compute mission cards, run readiness forecasts, verify audit trails, and export decision briefs through JSON-RPC tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to control Minecraft bots through a standardized JSON-RPC interface.12 npm40MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes remote, agent-facing MCP endpoints over Streamable HTTP for web search, webpage parsing, local knowledge-base retrieval and document creation, and delegation of tasks to configurable LLM providers. Also bundles an admin console with onboarding, provider/model configuration, API-key management, and call logging.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: system diagnostics, inference benchmarking, listing supported datasets, and fetching atlas regions. There is no meaningful overlap between any two tools.
Three tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (benchmark_inference, list_supported_studies, get_atlas_regions), but system_diagnostics breaks the pattern by using a noun phrase. The naming remains readable and mostly consistent.
Four tools is a reasonable size for a specialized server, but the set feels slightly minimal for the breadth of 'neural decoding' hinted at by the study and atlas tools. Still, each tool has a clear role and the count is not problematic.
The tools cover diagnostics, benchmarking, study listing, and atlas region lookup, but there are no tools to fetch study details, access actual neural data, or run decoding workflows. This creates notable gaps if the server is meant to support end-to-end neural decoding research.