Skip to main content
Glama
Svel26

Sigmatek LASAL MCP Server

by Svel26

Related Servers

Alternatives to Sigmatek LASAL MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with B\&R Automation Studio projects by building code, running ARsim simulators, and reading or writing OPC UA variables. It facilitates industrial automation development and real-time variable integration through natural language commands.
      13
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI to operate STEP 7-Micro/WIN SMART via MCP, supporting offline STL/AWL analysis, project inspection, online PLC monitoring (snap7), and engine-injected operations like compile, download, upload, and symbol management through natural language.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover, inspect, edit, rebuild, and save Schneider Electric RemoteConnect and SCADAPack x70 IEC logic projects, including program sections, hardware, variables, and Modbus configuration.
      63
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects AI assistants to Siemens TIA Portal via the Openness API. AI-assisted PLC programming, project management, hardware configuration, cross-reference analysis, and deployment. 19 tools, 230 actions.
      35
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to connect to Allen-Bradley, Siemens, and CODESYS PLC projects for discovering, asking questions about, analyzing, and proposing code changes, with access to live tag values and version exports under permission-scoped controls.
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are largely distinct with detailed descriptions, but there is some overlap in functionality (e.g., control_plc, build_project, and deploy_all all involve starting or downloading to a PLC; hmi_runtime and visu_project both touch the HMI). The descriptions clarify context (real vs. simulation, single step vs. pipeline), so misselection is unlikely but possible.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case style (e.g., control_plc, build_project, lars_runtime). While not every name follows the verb_noun pattern (lasal_status, plc_values are nouns), the naming convention is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well-scoped for a complex PLC/HMI development and automation environment. The count covers project management, build/deploy, runtime control, diagnostics, HMI validation, and browser testing without being overwhelming.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers the full development lifecycle: project selection, building, downloading, runtime state, diagnostics, HMI runtime management, and browser-based verification. It also includes composite pipelines like deploy_all and granular operations for LARS and VS engine, leaving no obvious gaps for typical tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues