superpos_hive_agents

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool lists agents with status and capabilities, implying a read-only operation. However, it does not explain what happens when hive_id is null (default) or specify any behavioral traits like pagination or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with a dash, front-loading the action. It is concise and to the point, though the second clause adds useful context. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with one optional parameter and an output schema, the description provides the core purpose and usage hint. However, it lacks explanation of the parameter's behavior when omitted, which is a gap for completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. The description mentions 'in the hive' but does not explicitly link 'hive_id' to filtering by hive, nor does it explain what a 'sibling' agent is. The purpose of the parameter is only partially inferable.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies the exact verb 'List', the resource 'sibling agents', and the returned information 'status and capabilities'. It also distinguishes itself from siblings like superpos_list_hives and superpos_list_issues by focusing on agents.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states the tool is 'useful before routing a task with target_capability or target_agent_id', providing a clear when-to-use scenario. It does not explicitly mention when not to use it or alternative tools, but the context is sufficient for an AI agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.