Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to superpos-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI coding agents to communicate, share state, and coordinate work in real time via MCP tools or REST API.
      202 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An enterprise-grade MCP server that enables AI coding assistants to securely connect with external tools, APIs, databases, and cloud services through a unified interface, offering structured engineering workflows and multi-client support.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI coding assistants persistent memory, structural code graph analysis, and safe multi-agent coordination, enabling them to answer architectural questions, track decisions across sessions, and coordinate safely in multi-agent workflows.
      39
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that coordinates AI coding agents with mobile notifications, enabling task queues, inter-agent messaging, session monitoring, and human-in-the-loop approvals.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 42 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with specific names like superpos_create_task vs superpos_create_issue, and descriptions that leave no ambiguity. Even related tools like poll_tasks and poll_events are easily differentiated by their target.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 42 tools follow the consistent pattern superpos_verb_noun in snake_case, with verbs like get, create, update, delete, list, poll, etc. This makes the API predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 42 tools, the count is high but appropriate for the broad scope of the server, which covers agent identity, task management, knowledge, schedules, issues, tracks, and hive exploration. A few tools could potentially be merged, but overall the granularity is justified.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of tasks, issues, tracks, schedules, and knowledge, plus extras like agent status, events, and hive mapping. No obvious gaps are apparent for the stated purpose of a multi-agent collaboration platform.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues