Skip to main content
Glama

get_operator

Read-only

Retrieve a specific operator's live metrics from SigRank by codename, including yield, leverage, velocity, class tier, rank, and per-window breakdowns.

Instructions

Fetches one operator's live profile from the SigRank board by their codename. Reads the operator's current submission data from signalaf.com and returns their detailed metrics: yield (Υ), leverage ratio (Cr/I), velocity (O/I), class tier (one of 24 experience stages: 8 tiers × 3 sub-stages, e.g. ARCH+ I, REFINER II, IGNITER III), rank position (integer, 1-based), and per-window breakdowns for each time range (7d, 30d, 90d, all-time) with the four canonical pillars (input, output, cacheCreate, cacheRead) per window. Returns an error if the codename is not found on the board. Use this to look up any operator who has submitted to the board — codenames are public and visible on the leaderboard. Do NOT use this to browse all operators — use get_leaderboard for that. After calling this, you can use simulate_change to model what would happen if the operator adjusted their token mix.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
codenameYesThe operator's public codename as shown on the SigRank leaderboard. Case-insensitive — "Ghost Falcon" and "ghost falcon" are equivalent. Must match a codename that exists on the board; returns an error if not found. To discover valid codenames, call get_leaderboard first.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
rankNo1-based rank position
classNo
yield_NoΥ Yield metric
batchedNoSubmission-based rolled-forward totals (never decrease when platforms delete old logs). Present when the operator has submission history.
windowsNoPer-window breakdowns (7d, 30d, 90d, all-time)
codenameNoOperator display name
leverageNoCr/I ratio
velocityNoO/I ratio
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, and the description adds meaningful behavioral context: reads live submission data from signalaf.com, returns an error if codename not found, and describes the detailed profile contents. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is front-loaded with the core purpose and contains useful usage and follow-up guidance. Slightly redundant with schema (error on not found, case-insensitivity), but each sentence earns its place by adding operational context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read-only lookup tool with an output schema and annotations, the description is complete: it covers purpose, source, scope, error case, alternative tool, and downstream action. No significant gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the codename parameter is already well-described with case-insensitivity, error behavior, and how to discover valid values. The description adds public-visibility context but does not materially go beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description opens with a specific verb+resource: 'Fetches one operator's live profile from the SigRank board by their codename.' It clearly differentiates from sibling get_leaderboard by explicitly scoping to a single operator and listing the returned metrics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit usage guidance: use to look up any operator who has submitted, do not use to browse all operators (use get_leaderboard instead), and mentions simulate_change as a follow-up. This is strong when-to-use and when-not-to-use context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SunrisesIllNeverSee/sigrank-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server