Skip to main content
Glama
SunrisesIllNeverSee

SigRank MCP server

by SunrisesIllNeverSee
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to SigRank MCP server

  • AI-Archive MCP Server

    AI-Archive-io
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to interact with the AI-Archive platform for research paper discovery through semantic search, paper submission and management, peer review with structured scoring, and citation generation in multiple formats.
    54
    11 npm
    1
    MIT

  • MCP Monitor

    Partha-SUST16
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An observability tool for agentic AI pipelines that intercepts MCP and Python tool calls to provide real-time metrics, session replays, and alerts via a local dashboard. It enables centralized monitoring of multiple MCP servers through multiplexer and proxy modes without requiring changes to existing agent code.
    3
    -

Related Servers

  • Agent Reputation MCP Server

    AiAgentKarl
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to rate each other, track interaction outcomes, and compute trust scores, with features like submitting ratings, getting reputation profiles, leaderboards, and trust computation.
    12 npm
    MIT
  • PolyRank MCP by polyrank

    PolyRank MCPofficial

    polyrank
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Provides AI agents with direct access to Polyrank's skill analytics for Polymarket, including leaderboards, trader skill metrics, calibration, market consensus, and live activity tracking.
    11
    5 npm
    2
    MIT

  • forge-mcp

    pm577
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables agents to carry portable reputation across platforms, with tools for registering agent identities, vouching, verifying trust, and managing memory.
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 25 tools

Disambiguation3/5

There are two crowded clusters: the paste-ranking family (rank_paste, submit_paste, rank_windows, get_sigrank_standard_record) and the local token-pull family (tokenpull, tokenpull_submit, tokenpull_compare, watch_tokenpull), where tools differ only subtly in preview vs submit vs multi-window behavior. Descriptions aggressively mitigate this with explicit 'Do NOT use X — use Y' notes, but misselection risk remains for an agent skimming. The tokscale_* tools are cleanly distinct from each other.

Naming Consistency4/5

Naming is uniformly snake_case and mostly follows verb_noun or namespace_noun patterns (rank_paste, get_leaderboard, submit_verified, tokscale_cost_analysis). A few names are bare nouns or single verbs (tokenpull, enroll, self_improve), which is a minor deviation from the otherwise predictable scheme.

Tool Count3/5

25 tools is on the heavy end and borders on over-scoped for a single MCP server, though the surface legitimately spans two broad subdomains (SigRank board workflows and tokscale local analytics). Several near-duplicate variants (tokenpull vs tokenpull_submit vs watch_tokenpull) inflate the count without adding much functional coverage.

Completeness4/5

Coverage is broad: local token pulls, paste ranking, multi-window ranking, leaderboard/operator lookup, enrollment, signed submission, diagnosis, suggestion, simulation, peer discovery, and a full tokscale analytics suite. Minor gaps exist (no unenroll/device-revocation tool, no explicit delete/withdraw submission), but core lifecycles are covered.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week

Resources