get_stage_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behaviors. It only states it 'gets' information, implying a non-destructive read, but omits idempotency, auth requirements, or side effects. More detail is needed for safe agent use.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The single-sentence description is concise with no fluff, earning base credit. However, it lacks structure or front-loading of key usage info, making it adequate but not well-organized.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one enum parameter and no output schema, the description is too minimal. It fails to specify the nature of the 'configuration and recommendations,' leaving an agent uncertain about the return value and how to interpret results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description should explain parameter meanings beyond the self-explanatory enum values. It merely mentions 'stage' implicitly, adding no insight into what configuration or recommendations are returned for each stage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves configuration and recommendations for a specific stage, which is a distinct read operation. The verb 'get' and resource 'configuration and recommendations' are specific, and the enum of stages differentiates it from sibling tools that create, save, or report.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like get_model_recommendation or get_recommended_prompt. It lacks context on prerequisites or alternative tools for similar tasks.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.