F
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that integrates with the Qase test management platform, allowing users to create and retrieve test cases, manage test runs, and interact with Qase projects.
23 npm
1
-
qa-mcp-server
by Suleidis9510
Related Servers
Alternatives to qa-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceFacilitates unified execution and result parsing for various testing frameworks, including Bats, Pytest, Flutter, Jest, and Go, through a Model Context Protocol interface.117MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceManages software project specifications with AI-powered guided creation, querying, validation, and dependency analysis through the Model Context Protocol.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides structured workflows (phases, gates, coordination) for AI agents, enabling complex task execution with quality enforcement and multi-agent coordination via Model Context Protocol.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceFacilitates interactive software development planning by managing tasks, tracking progress, and creating detailed implementation plans through the Model Context Protocol.624 npm397MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides structured workflow tools for managing software development projects through different complexity levels, offering specialized modes for project planning, design, implementation, and documentation.517 npm2MIT
TDQS
B3/5.0
Scored across 15 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of QA workflow (handoff, checkpoints, test cases, reporting, recommendations, validations). No two tools appear to do the same thing.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., create_test_case, validate_context_health), making it easy to predict functionality.
Tool Count5/5
15 tools is well-scoped for a QA server covering test creation, execution, reporting, defect tracking, and stage management. Each tool serves a clear purpose.
Completeness4/5
Core workflows (create, find, execute, report, validate) are covered. Minor gaps include missing update/delete operations for test cases, but the surface is sufficient for the intended structured process.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues