beam-analysis
# beam-analysis-mcp
A **lightweight MCP (Model Context Protocol) server** for linear-static structural analysis of **bridges and building frames**, written in Node.js with no heavy dependencies.
It gives an AI client (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, ...) tools to:
- **Build 3D beam/truss models** (nodes, members, sections, materials, supports, loads) or generate complete structures from **parametric typology presets** (girder bridges, Pratt/Howe/Warren truss bridges, arch bridges, cable-stayed bridges, portal frames, moment frames, 3D braced buildings, roof trusses).
- **Analyze** them with two engines:
- **`beam`** — built-in 3D direct-stiffness frame solver (pure JavaScript, instant). Euler-Bernoulli elements with consistent fixed-end forces and exact in-span deflection/moment recovery — one element per member is enough.
- **`calculix`** — writes a CalculiX input deck (B32R beam elements), runs `ccx`, and parses displacements/reactions. Use `engine: "both"` to cross-check the two solvers.
- **Export to FreeCAD** — builds a solid 3D model of the structure and saves a `.FCStd` document you can open and inspect in FreeCAD.
- Get **member force envelopes** (N, V, M, T), **stresses**, and **utilization** (σ/fy), **reactions**, and **displacements**.
> **No CalculiX install needed if you have FreeCAD**: FreeCAD bundles `ccx` with its FEM workbench, and this server auto-detects it (e.g. `C:\Program Files\FreeCAD 1.1\bin\ccx.exe`).
## Requirements
- Node.js ≥ 18
- Optional: [FreeCAD](https://www.freecad.org/) (provides both `freecadcmd` for export **and** the bundled CalculiX solver)
- Optional: standalone [CalculiX](http://www.calculix.de/) (`ccx`) if you don't use FreeCAD
## Install & run
```bash
git clone https://github.com/StructuralWizard/beam-analysis-mcp.git
cd beam-analysis-mcp
npm install
npm test # closed-form validation + MCP e2e + CalculiX cross-check
npm run typologies # analyze 10 bridge/building typologies with both engines
```
### Claude Desktop / Claude Code configuration
Add to `claude_desktop_config.json` (or `.mcp.json` for Claude Code):
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"beam-analysis": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["C:/path/to/beam-analysis-mcp/src/server.js"]
}
}
}
```
Optional environment variables:
| Variable | Purpose |
|---|---|
| `CCX_PATH` | Explicit path to the CalculiX `ccx` executable |
| `FREECAD_CMD` | Explicit path to `freecadcmd` |
| `BEAM_MCP_OUTPUT` | Default directory for exported `.FCStd` / `.inp` files (default `~/beam-mcp-output`) |
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| `check_environment` | Report Node/ccx/freecadcmd availability and unit conventions |
| `create_model` | Create an empty model |
| `list_structure_presets` | List parametric typology generators and their defaults |
| `generate_structure` | Build a complete bridge/building from a preset + parameter overrides |
| `add_nodes` / `add_material` / `add_section` / `add_members` / `add_supports` / `add_loads` | Manual model building |
| `analyze` | Run linear-static analysis (`beam`, `calculix`, or `both` with comparison) |
| `get_results` | Detailed displacements, reactions, or member force envelopes |
| `render_model` | Render an SVG figure: geometry, mesh, deformed shape, moment/shear/axial diagrams, stress/strain maps |
| `export_freecad` | Save a solid 3D `.FCStd` model (opens in FreeCAD) |
| `export_calculix_inp` | Write the CalculiX `.inp` deck without solving |
| `model_info` / `list_models` / `delete_model` | Session management |
## Structure presets
| Preset | Typology |
|---|---|
| `beam_bridge` | Simply supported or continuous girder bridge (1..n spans) |
| `truss_bridge` | 3D through-truss bridge — `pratt`, `howe`, or `warren` |
| `arch_bridge` | Deck arch bridge: parabolic rib + spandrel columns + deck girder |
| `cable_stayed_bridge` | Single-pylon fan-pattern cable-stayed bridge |
| `portal_frame` | Gable portal frame (warehouse/industrial shed) |
| `moment_frame_building` | Multi-story multi-bay moment-resisting frame |
| `braced_frame_building` | Full 3D building with columns, two-way beams, perimeter X-bracing |
| `roof_truss` | Triangular (Howe-style) roof truss |
Example conversation with an MCP client:
> "Generate a 3-span continuous girder bridge (30 m + 40 m + 30 m), analyze it with both engines, and export it to FreeCAD."
which maps to `generate_structure {preset: "beam_bridge", params: {spans: [30,40,30]}}` → `analyze {engine: "both"}` → `export_freecad`.
## Conventions
- **Units**: SI — meters, Newtons, Pascals, kg/m³. Downward loads are **negative** `fz`/`wz`.
- **Axes**: global +Z is up. Member local x runs along the member; for non-vertical members local z lies in the vertical plane, so section depth `h` resists gravity bending (strong axis = `Iy`).
- **Supports**: `fixed`, `pinned`, `roller` (uz), `roller-yz` (bridge sliding bearing), `planar-xz` (out-of-plane restraint for 2D models), or a custom 6-flag string like `"111100"` (ux,uy,uz,rx,ry,rz).
- **Member types**: `beam` (6-DOF frame element) or `truss` (axial only — braces, cables, truss webs).
## Validation
Full test documentation — every test case, the theory it checks against, tolerances, and the investigation notes behind the cross-engine differences — is in [docs/VALIDATION.md](docs/VALIDATION.md).
An **illustrated per-structure validation report** for all 10 typologies — geometry/supports/loads figures, CalculiX meshes, load cases with superposition checks, deformed shapes (built-in vs CalculiX overlay), moment/shear/axial diagrams, stress & strain maps, CalculiX von Mises fields parsed from `.frd`, and 35 analytical hand-calculation checks — is in [docs/validation/](docs/validation/README.md).
`npm test` checks the solver against closed-form solutions:
- Simply supported beam under UDL: `5wL⁴/384EI` deflection and `wL²/8` moment (exact to 1e-6)
- Cantilever tip load / UDL: `PL³/3EI`, `wL⁴/8EI`, fixed-end moments
- Two-bar truss axial force `P/(2 sin θ)`
- Equilibrium (ΣR = ΣF) on every generator preset
- Cross-validation against CalculiX (skipped automatically if `ccx` is not installed)
`npm run typologies` builds and analyzes 10 typologies end-to-end and prints a built-in vs CalculiX comparison table. Results on the reference machine (FreeCAD 1.1 bundled CalculiX 2.22, Windows 11):
| # | Typology | Nodes/Members | Max defl. beam [mm] | Max defl. ccx [mm] | Diff | Equilibrium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simply supported girder bridge (35 m) | 7/6 | 137.40 | 138.11 | 0.5% | ok |
| 2 | Continuous girder bridge (30+40+30 m) | 19/18 | 56.65 | 57.83 | 2.0% | ok |
| 3 | Pratt truss bridge (60 m) | 32/74 | 48.46 | 48.23 | 0.5% | ok |
| 4 | Warren truss bridge (64 m) | 34/79 | 69.51 | 69.27 | 0.3% | ok |
| 5 | Deck arch bridge (90 m) | 34/47 | 10.72 | 10.74 | 0.2% | ok |
| 6 | Cable-stayed bridge (140 m) | 15/26 | 118.90 | 118.72 | 0.2% | ok |
| 7 | Portal frame warehouse (30 m) | 5/4 | 136.30 | 131.22 | 3.7% | ok |
| 8 | 5-story moment frame | 24/35 | 5.60 | 5.59 | 0.3% | ok |
| 9 | 6-story 3D braced tower | 63/174 | 11.51 | 19.64 | 41%* | ok |
| 10 | Howe roof truss (28 m) | 16/29 | 13.86 | 13.22 | 4.6% | ok |
\* Expected: the tower mixes several cross-sections, and CalculiX models joints between members of different sections as flexible "knots" (see Limitations). Re-run with uniform sections and the two engines agree within 6%.
## Limitations
- Linear static only: no buckling, no dynamics, no P-Δ, no nonlinear cable sag (stays are modeled as linear truss members that can also take compression).
- The two engines answer slightly different questions: the built-in solver assumes ideal rigid joints (classic beam theory), while CalculiX expands beams into solid elements and models joints between members of *different* sections as "knots", which are more flexible. Agreement is sub-1% on determinate structures and within a few % on frames with uniform sections, but expect larger differences (which ccx reports as a note) on tall 3D frames mixing many sections.
- CalculiX backend reports displacements and reactions; member force envelopes come from the built-in engine.
- I-sections and generic sections are mapped to an equivalent rectangle in the CalculiX deck (ccx beam sections support RECT/CIRC/PIPE/BOX only).
- Results are for **preliminary/educational analysis** — not a substitute for design verification by a qualified engineer.
## License
MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. The add_* tools each add a different aspect (nodes, materials, sections, members, supports, loads), and all other tools (analyze, export, list, delete, etc.) are uniquely identifiable. There is no overlap or confusion between tools.
Most tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., add_nodes, list_models, get_results). However, 'model_info' is a noun_info construction and 'analyze' is a bare verb, which deviates slightly from the predominant pattern, so it is not perfectly consistent.
With 17 tools, the server covers a comprehensive workflow for parametric structural analysis: model creation, component addition, analysis, results retrieval, export, and management. The count is well-scoped for its domain, each tool earning its place.
The tool set covers the core workflow (create, add components, analyze, get results, export), but lacks update or delete operations for individual components (e.g., no tool to modify a node or remove a member). This is a notable gap for iterative design, though the essential lifecycle is present.