Skip to main content
Glama
StructuralWizard

beam-analysis

Related Servers

Alternatives to beam-analysis

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Ultra-lightweight MCP server for construction calculations and material estimation, enabling material calculator and cost estimator tools for structures like foundations, walls, slabs, and beams.
      4
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives an AI assistant a set of real mechanical-engineering tools. Provides deterministic tools like material properties, beam analysis, unit conversion, and curve fitting for engineering calculations.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to interact with Nastran FEA models by reading, writing, and analyzing BDF and OP2 files. It provides tools for mesh quality assessment, geometric analysis, and automated report generation for structural engineering workflows.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides structural load and stability math (tipping, support reactions, beam checks) that language models often get wrong, enabling AI assistants to compute accurate engineering estimates.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with FreeCAD for 3D modeling, macro development, and debugging through 150+ tools supporting multiple connection modes.
      442 PyPI
      234
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables automation of FreeCAD model creation, macro execution, and view management through a server-client architecture, supporting integration with external AI tools like Claude and Cursor.
      100
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. The add_* tools each add a different aspect (nodes, materials, sections, members, supports, loads), and all other tools (analyze, export, list, delete, etc.) are uniquely identifiable. There is no overlap or confusion between tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., add_nodes, list_models, get_results). However, 'model_info' is a noun_info construction and 'analyze' is a bare verb, which deviates slightly from the predominant pattern, so it is not perfectly consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 17 tools, the server covers a comprehensive workflow for parametric structural analysis: model creation, component addition, analysis, results retrieval, export, and management. The count is well-scoped for its domain, each tool earning its place.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers the core workflow (create, add components, analyze, get results, export), but lacks update or delete operations for individual components (e.g., no tool to modify a node or remove a member). This is a notable gap for iterative design, though the essential lifecycle is present.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive