create_sync_job

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, and the description only states that it creates a sync job. It does not disclose whether the job runs immediately, whether it is idempotent, what permissions are required, or what side effects occur on the target schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a concise docstring with a one-sentence summary followed by a flat list of parameters. No redundant information or lengthy caveats, every line serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although the tool is complex with 8 parameters and no annotations, the description explains all parameter meanings and an output schema exists, so return values are covered. However, it lacks expected usage context and behavioral caveats such as whether the operation is reversible or asynchronous, leaving some completeness gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no descriptions for any parameters, but the description compensates by listing all 8 arguments with brief Russian explanations, including enum-like values for import_scope ('one_schema' or 'whole_database') and import_mode ('replace' or 'merge'). It also clarifies that agent_schema_uuid is for one_schema scope.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the verb 'Создать' (create) with a specific resource 'задачу синхронизации структуры базы' (database structure sync job), which clearly differentiates it from sibling tools like list_sync_jobs and get_sync_job.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention listing, retrieving, or deleting sync jobs, nor any prerequisites like establishing a data source or agent connection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.