Structly MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Structly MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to deploy production APIs from JSON schemas, with 44 tools for managing projects, schemas, deployments, and graph data.864 PyPI1Academic Free v1.1
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with DBT (Data Build Tool) projects, allowing them to query project metadata, inspect models and sources, view compiled SQL, and run DBT commands.1415MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to format SQL, explain queries in plain English, analyze schemas, build queries from natural language, and generate migrations, all without requiring a database connection.534 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with local SQLite databases with full CRUD, schema introspection, foreign key relations, generated columns, and multi-format import/export (CSV, JSON, XLSX) through natural language.2610 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI models to interact with SQLite Cloud databases, supporting SQL queries, schema management, and performance analysis.16 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read and edit entity-relationship diagrams and SQL database schemas on the liz-whiteboard collaborative whiteboard through natural language, supporting table, column, and relationship management.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 47 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes following a predictable verb_noun pattern. However, a few pairs like commit_schema vs commit_to_branch and ai_apply_schema vs import_sql_into_schema could cause confusion without careful reading of descriptions. Overall, the high number of tools makes selection slightly harder but still manageable.
All tool names use consistent snake_case verb_noun structure, e.g., list_projects, create_table, edit_column, delete_relationship. The verbs are uniformly used: 'list' for collections, 'get' for single items, 'create/edit/delete' for CRUD operations, and domain-specific actions like 'commit', 'merge', 'checkout' are clearly named. No mixed conventions or inconsistent patterns.
With 47 tools, the server is well beyond the 25+ threshold, making it feel heavy and potentially overwhelming for agents. While the domain is broad (project/schema/table management, version control, data sync, AI features), this count exceeds what is typically optimal for a single MCP server. The number could likely be consolidated or split into multiple focused servers.
The tool surface is exceptionally comprehensive, covering full CRUD for projects, schemas, tables, columns, groups, and relationships, plus branch/commit management, migration generation, AI-assisted schema design, SQL import/export, and data source sync. There are no obvious dead ends or missing essential operations; even advanced workflows like merging branches and scheduling sync jobs are supported.