tattoo-brief-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| build_tattoo_briefC | Turn a tattoo idea, style, placement and size into a structured brief to bring to a tattoo artist. |
| check_small_size_legibilityB | Heuristic blur-risk check for tattoo details at a given size. Rules of thumb only, not a guarantee. |
| line_art_promptC | Write a clean line-art prompt (plus negative prompt) for an AI tattoo generator. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a clearly distinct action: composing a structured brief, running a legibility heuristic, and generating a line-art prompt. There is no functional overlap between them.
Two tools follow a verb_noun pattern (build_tattoo_brief, check_small_size_legibility) while line_art_prompt is noun_noun, a minor deviation. Still readable and predictable overall.
Three tools is a tight but coherent set for a niche tattoo-brief helper, each earning its place. Slightly thin but not under-scoped for the narrow domain.
The set covers brief creation, a size check, and prompt output, but there is no way to refine/update an existing brief or persist it. These are notable gaps an agent must work around by regenerating from scratch.