Skip to main content
Glama
tattoo-brief-mcp

tattoo-brief-mcp

by Stark-Will

Related Servers

Alternatives to tattoo-brief-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables planning a tattoo before consulting an artist by generating Markdown tattoo briefs, flagging small-size legibility risks with suggested minimum sizes, and producing clean line-art prompts with negative prompts for AI tattoo generators.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to assess infrastructure-as-code deployment risk, generate incident response runbooks, review CI/CD delivery readiness, and calculate SLO error budgets through structured advisory tools. Runs locally over stdio without cloud credentials or external API calls, returning guidance for platform work, pull request review, and production readiness checks.
      12
      185 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes eighteen garden-planning tools to AI agents over stdio, enabling crop calendar and planting-window lookups, companion planting graphs, crop rotation and succession planning, pest and disease intelligence with beneficial-insect cross-references, and USDA zone plus climate classification. All data is curated and served offline, so agents can answer climate-aware scheduling questions without live API calls.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes 11 agent-native QA tools over stdio so coding agents can discover a project, analyze risk, select the smallest relevant test set, generate and dry-run tests, triage failures, propose tiered heals, analyze flakes, generate quality reports, and evaluate release readiness. Planning and healing tools stay read-only or propose-only, while execution defaults to dry-run, keeping agent actions safe and evidence-backed.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct action: composing a structured brief, running a legibility heuristic, and generating a line-art prompt. There is no functional overlap between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Two tools follow a verb_noun pattern (build_tattoo_brief, check_small_size_legibility) while line_art_prompt is noun_noun, a minor deviation. Still readable and predictable overall.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is a tight but coherent set for a niche tattoo-brief helper, each earning its place. Slightly thin but not under-scoped for the narrow domain.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers brief creation, a size check, and prompt output, but there is no way to refine/update an existing brief or persist it. These are notable gaps an agent must work around by regenerating from scratch.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing