Skip to main content
Glama
Stark-Will

tattoo-brief-mcp

by Stark-Will

Related Servers

Alternatives to tattoo-brief-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to assess infrastructure-as-code deployment risk, generate incident response runbooks, review CI/CD delivery readiness, and calculate SLO error budgets through structured advisory tools. Runs locally over stdio without cloud credentials or external API calls, returning guidance for platform work, pull request review, and production readiness checks.
      12
      158 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes 11 agent-native QA tools over stdio so coding agents can discover a project, analyze risk, select the smallest relevant test set, generate and dry-run tests, triage failures, propose tiered heals, analyze flakes, generate quality reports, and evaluate release readiness. Planning and healing tools stay read-only or propose-only, while execution defaults to dry-run, keeping agent actions safe and evidence-backed.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform exact, reproducible mechanical computation — text diffing, hashing, JSON querying, calendar arithmetic, deadline-bounded regex extraction, CSV parsing, similarity scoring, unit and base conversion — instead of relying on probabilistic guessing. Runs dependency-free, read-only and offline over stdio, with schema validation and hard caps on every operation so no call can hang the client.
      15
      38 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to design, modify, and verify exact B-rep 3D CAD models by running build123d scripts on an OpenCascade kernel, with live three.js preview, collision and FDM printability checks, text-based spatial perception, user notes/sketch annotations, version history, and one-click export to OrcaSlicer.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct action: composing a structured brief, running a legibility heuristic, and generating a line-art prompt. There is no functional overlap between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Two tools follow a verb_noun pattern (build_tattoo_brief, check_small_size_legibility) while line_art_prompt is noun_noun, a minor deviation. Still readable and predictable overall.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is a tight but coherent set for a niche tattoo-brief helper, each earning its place. Slightly thin but not under-scoped for the narrow domain.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers brief creation, a size check, and prompt output, but there is no way to refine/update an existing brief or persist it. These are notable gaps an agent must work around by regenerating from scratch.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues