tattoo-brief-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to tattoo-brief-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables planning a tattoo before consulting an artist by generating Markdown tattoo briefs, flagging small-size legibility risks with suggested minimum sizes, and producing clean line-art prompts with negative prompts for AI tattoo generators.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceCreate AI tattoo design concepts from a text prompt in 13 styles and search a public tattoo gallery.608 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI clients to assess infrastructure-as-code deployment risk, generate incident response runbooks, review CI/CD delivery readiness, and calculate SLO error budgets through structured advisory tools. Runs locally over stdio without cloud credentials or external API calls, returning guidance for platform work, pull request review, and production readiness checks.12185 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables a small local AI model to discover, describe, run, undo, and verify deterministic tools over JSON-RPC on stdio, with previews and approval gates for changes.10AGPL 3.0

@cropgraph/mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceExposes eighteen garden-planning tools to AI agents over stdio, enabling crop calendar and planting-window lookups, companion planting graphs, crop rotation and succession planning, pest and disease intelligence with beneficial-insect cross-references, and USDA zone plus climate classification. All data is curated and served offline, so agents can answer climate-aware scheduling questions without live API calls.1MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes 11 agent-native QA tools over stdio so coding agents can discover a project, analyze risk, select the smallest relevant test set, generate and dry-run tests, triage failures, propose tiered heals, analyze flakes, generate quality reports, and evaluate release readiness. Planning and healing tools stay read-only or propose-only, while execution defaults to dry-run, keeping agent actions safe and evidence-backed.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a clearly distinct action: composing a structured brief, running a legibility heuristic, and generating a line-art prompt. There is no functional overlap between them.
Two tools follow a verb_noun pattern (build_tattoo_brief, check_small_size_legibility) while line_art_prompt is noun_noun, a minor deviation. Still readable and predictable overall.
Three tools is a tight but coherent set for a niche tattoo-brief helper, each earning its place. Slightly thin but not under-scoped for the narrow domain.
The set covers brief creation, a size check, and prompt output, but there is no way to refine/update an existing brief or persist it. These are notable gaps an agent must work around by regenerating from scratch.