Skip to main content
Glama
SmartBear MCP server

SmartBear MCP server

Official
by SmartBear

Contract Testing: List Integrations

contract-testing_list_integrations
Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists all consumer-provider integrations in a workspace to help you audit and manage contract testing connections between services.

Instructions

Retrieve all consumer-provider integrations registered in the workspace.

Toolset: Integrations and Network

Parameters:

  • pageNumber (number): Page number (default: 1)

  • pageSize (number): Results per page (default: 5)

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageSizeNoResults per page
pageNumberNoPage number

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo
_linksNo
_embeddedNo
paginationNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.43.0
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$defs": {
      +    "EmbeddedLink": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "properties": {
      +        "href": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "name": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "templated": {
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        },
      +        "title": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "Integration": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "properties": {
      +        "_links": {
      +          "additionalProperties": {},
      +          "properties": {
      +            "pb:dashboard": {
      +              "$ref": "#/$defs/EmbeddedLink"
      +            },
      +            "pb:delete_integration": {
      +              "$ref": "#/$defs/EmbeddedLink"
      +            },
      +            "pb:group": {
      +              "$ref": "#/$defs/EmbeddedLink"
      +            },
      +            "pb:matrix": {
      +              "$ref": "#/$defs/EmbeddedLink"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "consumer": {
      +          "additionalProperties": {},
      +          "properties": {
      +            "name": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "provider": {
      +          "additionalProperties": {},
      +          "properties": {
      +            "name": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "verificationModes": {
      +          "items": {
      +            "anyOf": [
      +              {
      +                "const": "comparison",
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              {
      +                "const": "replay",
      +                "type": "string"
      +              }
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "type": "array"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "Page": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "properties": {
      +        "number": {
      +          "type": "number"
      +        },
      +        "size": {
      +          "type": "number"
      +        },
      +        "totalElements": {
      +          "type": "number"
      +        },
      +        "totalPages": {
      +          "type": "number"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "properties": {
      +    "_embedded": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "properties": {
      +        "integrations": {
      +          "items": {
      +            "$ref": "#/$defs/Integration"
      +          },
      +          "type": "array"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "_links": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "properties": {
      +        "self": {
      +          "$ref": "#/$defs/EmbeddedLink"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "page": {
      +      "$ref": "#/$defs/Page"
      +    },
      +    "pagination": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "properties": {
      +        "pageNumber": {
      +          "type": "number"
      +        },
      +        "pageSize": {
      +          "type": "number"
      +        },
      +        "totalItems": {
      +          "type": "number"
      +        },
      +        "totalPages": {
      +          "type": "number"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "pageNumber",
      +        "pageSize",
      +        "totalItems",
      +        "totalPages"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Addedv0.40.0
  3. Removedv0.34.0
  4. First observedv0.27.1

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is fully covered by structured data. The description's only added behavioral fact is the workspace scope, which is useful but modest, and it defers return-shape details to the output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The core purpose is front-loaded in a single clear sentence, and the trailing toolset/parameter block is short. The parameter list duplicates the schema rather than adding value, which is the only real waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the definition need not explain return values, and the annotations fully cover the safety profile, so the description's job is largely scope plus pagination. Scope is stated clearly; only the lack of any sibling differentiation and paging guidance keeps it from being complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so pagination is already documented by the input schema. The description restates pageNumber and pageSize with their defaults verbatim and adds no constraints, ranges, maximums, or ordering semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Retrieve all consumer-provider integrations registered in the workspace.' That is meaningfully more specific than the title alone, but it does not distinguish itself from closely related siblings such as contract-testing_get_integrations_by_team, contract-testing_delete_all_integrations, or contract-testing_get_pacticipant_network.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says what it does but offers no when-to-use guidance: no exclusions, no alternative such as the team-scoped integrations call, and no note on how to page through a large result set. The only implicit cue is 'all ... in the workspace', which does not help an agent choose among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools