Skip to main content
Glama
SmartBear

SmartBear MCP server

Official
by SmartBear

Related Servers

Alternatives to SmartBear MCP server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with seamless access to SmartBear's suite of testing and monitoring tools, enabling querying testing data, analyzing performance metrics, and managing test automation through natural language.
      4,262 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lets AI assistants inspect test run results, AI QA reports, and findings with their full evidence, and, when asked, start runs, re-run only failed tests, import API specs, or scan a website. Read-only tools are free, while work-starting tools consume the workspace's allowance and report usage limits.
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Sauce Labs testing platform through natural language, providing access to device cloud management, test job analysis, build monitoring, and testing infrastructure insights. Supports both Virtual Device Cloud (VDC) and Real Device Cloud (RDC) with comprehensive test analytics and team collaboration features.
      34
      10
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with TestRail test management systems through comprehensive API integration. Supports retrieving and updating test cases, projects, suites, runs, and results, plus adding attachments and managing test data through natural language commands.
      18
      15 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Xray Test Management for both Cloud and Server deployments. Supports test execution, importing results from multiple formats (JUnit, Cucumber, Robot Framework, TestNG), and managing test plans and executions.
      8
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 309 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Tools are separated by product prefix (e.g., reflect_, swagger_, qmetry_), making cross-product distinctions clear. However, within each product there are many similar fetch/create/update tools (e.g., qmetry_fetch_test_cases vs. qmetry_fetch_test_case_details vs. qmetry_fetch_test_case_steps), which can be confusing in a set of 309 tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Names consistently follow a product-prefix + verb_noun pattern (e.g., reflect_list_tests, swagger_create_portal, contract-testing_create_webhook). Minor variations like verb_verb_noun (swagger_create_or_update_api) are rare and still readable.

    Tool Count1/5

    309 tools is an extreme mismatch for a single MCP server, far exceeding the typical 3-15 range. Even for a multi-product server, this volume likely overwhelms an agent's context and increases misselection risk.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface is very broad, covering create/read/update for many entities across products. Some gaps exist (e.g., no delete for QMetry test cases or requirements, no delete portal in Swagger), but most core workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week