Afficher le tableau des derniers fichiers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must convey behavior. It discloses the interactive table display, version history expansion, and internal use of fileId. Lacks details on authentication or rendering specifics, but sufficient for a display tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences with no fluff: first sentence defines function, second gives usage with example, third clarifies alternatives and fileId purpose. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but description adequately explains the interactive output (table with expandable versions). Could mention column details, but not necessary for an app tool. Covers key use cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by explaining fileId's role ('used internally by app UI') and context for limit. No further detail needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool shows an interactive MCP App table of recent files, with version history expansion on click. It distinguishes itself from sibling tc_files (plain data) and mentions alternative usage with fileId. The verb 'Show' and resource 'table of latest files' are specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use: 'when the user asks to SEE/DISPLAY recent files' with an example query. Also states when not to use: 'For plain data without UI, use tc_files instead.' This provides clear decision guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.