Skip to main content
Glama
SimonTrim

Trimble Connect MCP Server

by SimonTrim

tc_clashes

Manage clash sets in Trimble Connect: create, list, get, update, and delete clash reports to resolve model conflicts.

Instructions

Trimble Connect Clash sets (create, inspect, update, delete clash reports). Select the endpoint with the "action" parameter. Path placeholders {projectId}/{id}/{subId}/{extraId}/{version} are filled from the matching input parameters. Actions:

  • list: GET /clashsets — query: {projectId}

  • get: GET /clashsets/{id} — id=clashId

  • list_items: GET /clashsets/{id}/items — id=clashId

  • create: POST /clashsets — body: CreateClashRequest {name, projectId, models, clearance...}

  • update: PATCH /clashsets/{id} — id=clashId, body: fields to update

  • delete: DELETE /clashsets/{id} — id=clashId

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNoPrimary resource ID — required when the action path contains {id}
bodyNoJSON request body for POST/PUT/PATCH (and some DELETE) actions
queryNoQuery parameters as key-value pairs
subIdNoSecondary resource ID — required when the action path contains {subId}
actionYesEndpoint to call (see tool description)
regionYesTrimble Connect region: us (North America), eu (Europe), ap (Asia-Pacific), ap-au (Australia)
extraIdNoTertiary resource ID — required when the action path contains {extraId}
versionNoVersion number — required when the action path contains {version}
projectIdNoProject ID — required when the action path contains {projectId}
bcfVersionNoBCF API version for BCF actions (default 2.1)
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the full burden. It details the HTTP method, path, and required parameters for each action, including the plumbing of path placeholders. However, it lacks explicit warnings about destructive actions like delete or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with a concise summary and structured as an actionable list. It is efficient but could be slightly more compact by merging redundant phrasing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (10 parameters, 6 actions, no output schema), the description is largely complete, covering routing logic and action-specific details. It omits return value descriptions, but no output schema exists to compensate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema coverage is 100% (baseline 3), the description adds value by mapping parameters to path placeholders (e.g., 'id=clashId') and explaining that 'body' is for POST/PUT/PATCH. It could be more explicit about query parameters for each action.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool handles 'Trimble Connect Clash sets (create, inspect, update, delete clash reports)' and enumerates six specific actions with HTTP methods and paths, distinguishing it from siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains how to select an action via the 'action' parameter and maps actions to endpoints, but it does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling tools like 'tc_list_clashsets' or alternative approaches.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SimonTrim/trb-mcp-server-api'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server