cap_watchlists_remove_market

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions a confirmation requirement but does not explain what 'when configured' means, whether the removal is permanent, or any side effects. The destructive nature is not emphasized.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief with two short sentences, no redundancy. It is front-loaded with the core action. However, it sacrifices some useful detail that could be added without bloat.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given three parameters with no schema descriptions, the description fails to adequately explain the tool's usage. It does not cover parameter roles, error handling, or behavior when the market is absent. The presence of an output schema does not compensate for this lack.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must add meaning beyond the schema. It only clarifies 'EPIC' for the market identifier but leaves watchlist_id and confirm unexplained. The confirm parameter hint is vague.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove'), the resource ('market from a watchlist'), and specifies the identifier type ('EPIC'). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like add_market or delete watchlist.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a minimal hint about the confirm parameter ('Requires confirm when configured'), but lacks explicit guidance on when to use or avoid the tool compared to alternatives. It does not address prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.