cap_trade_execute_position

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries burden. It discloses that execution creates a real trade and mentions SDK safety gates, but lacks details on side effects, authorization needs, or irreversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a single front-loaded sentence. It could be slightly more structured, but it is efficient for a short description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given four parameters, no annotations, and no parameter descriptions, the description is inadequate. It does not explain the confirmation process or timeout, making the tool's behavior unclear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must explain parameters but does not mention any of the four parameters (preview_id, confirm, wait_for_confirm, timeout_s), leaving the agent without guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Execute a previewed position' and emphasizes 'CREATES A REAL TRADE', specifying the action and resource. It distinguishes from preview tools like cap_trade_preview_position.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage after preview and mentions SDK safety gates, but does not explicitly state when to use vs alternatives (e.g., cap_trade_execute_working_order) or when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.