get_friend_list
Retrieve your friend list from DDNet. Use this tool to view all friends associated with your account.
Instructions
获取好友列表
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve your friend list from DDNet. Use this tool to view all friends associated with your account.
获取好友列表
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether it is a read operation, authentication requirements, or what the response contains.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely brief (one phrase), but it lacks informative content. Conciseness without substance is under-specification.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no parameters, and no annotations, the description is critically incomplete. It does not explain what the tool returns or its behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so the description does not need to add meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 4 applies per rules for 0 parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description is a direct translation of the tool name ('Get friend list'), providing no additional information about the resource or scope. It is a tautology.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidance is provided. There is no indication of when to use this tool versus siblings like add_bind or get_ddnet_game_status.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SilverHi/ddnet-mcpserver'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server