Skip to main content
Glama
Siddharth202002

Finance Tracking MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Finance Tracking MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Tracks and manages personal expenses with tools to add, view, filter by category, and summarize spending over date ranges using SQLite storage.
      4
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables tracking and managing personal expenses through a local SQLite database. Supports adding, editing, deleting, listing, and summarizing expenses by category, as well as managing credit accounts.
      6
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables logging and tracking personal expenses in a local SQLite database with category/subcategory validation, offering tools to add, view, summarize, and delete expenses.
      4
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language management of personal expenses, including adding, listing, and summarizing expenses with local SQLite storage.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to track and manage daily expenses through SQLite storage, supporting operations like adding, updating, deleting expenses, calculating totals by category, and filtering expenses by date range or category.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural language management of personal expenses, including adding, updating, deleting, searching, and summarizing expenses stored in a local SQLite database.
      6
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: summarizing expenses, adding new ones, and editing existing ones. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their functions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Two tools follow a verb_noun pattern (add_expense, edit_expense), while expense_summary deviates slightly as a noun-first name. This minor inconsistency does not hinder readability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 3 tools, the server is well-scoped for a focused expense tracking purpose. Each tool earns its place with no redundancy or excess.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers add, edit, and summary, but lacks a delete operation and a way to retrieve individual expense details. This represents a notable gap in lifecycle coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues