dag-planner-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to dag-planner-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for agentic task orchestration and management, enabling AI agents to create goals, plan tasks with acceptance criteria, track dependencies, request human input, and provide proof of completion.9 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceServer-enforced workflow discipline for AI agents. An MCP server providing persistent work items, dependency graphs, quality gates, and actor attribution. Schemas define what agents must produce — the server blocks the call if they don't. Works with any MCP-compatible client.205MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceCampaign orchestration MCP server for AI agents — dependency DAGs, parallel fan-out, failure policies, and embedded notes.21GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local, model-independent DAG task coordinator for AI coding agents, with a static visual UI, validated state machine, resumable JSON progress, and MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables autonomous multi-agent orchestration using directed acyclic graph workflows to interact with external developer infrastructure such as Git, Postgres, and Docker through safety-gated MCP servers.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn agent-native workflow MCP server that enables AI agents to execute text-defined, versionable workflows with checkpointing and state management.107 npm-
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action or resource, with descriptions clearly differentiating between agent-specific and system operations. Even conceptually similar tools like mark_task_blocked_human and request_human_input serve separate purposes (blocking vs. input request). No ambiguity.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case, with verbs like claim, create, get, list, mark, put, replace, request, resume, submit, update, validate. The naming is predictable and easy to navigate.
24 tools is on the higher side but reasonable for a DAG planner covering run management, task lifecycle, payloads, human-in-the-loop, and validation. Each tool has a distinct role, and the scope justifies the count without overwhelming.
The tool set covers the full lifecycle of creating runs, plans, and managing tasks with state transitions, checkpoints, and human interaction. Minor gaps exist such as no explicit delete or cancel run tool, but core workflows are well-supported.