Skip to main content
Glama

jira_search

Search Jira issues using JQL to find issues by project, status, assignee, priority, and other criteria. Supports pagination and custom field selection.

Instructions

Search Jira issues using JQL (Jira Query Language).

Args: ctx: The FastMCP context. jql: JQL query string. fields: Comma-separated fields to return. limit: Maximum number of results. start_at: Starting index for pagination. projects_filter: Comma-separated list of project keys to filter by. expand: Optional fields to expand.

Returns: JSON string representing the search results including pagination info.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
jqlYesJQL query string (Jira Query Language). Examples: - Find Epics: "issuetype = Epic AND project = PROJ" - Find issues in Epic: "parent = PROJ-123" - Find by status: "status = 'In Progress' AND project = PROJ" - Find by assignee: "assignee = currentUser()" - Find recently updated: "updated >= -7d AND project = PROJ" - Find by label: "labels = frontend AND project = PROJ" - Find by priority: "priority = High AND project = PROJ"
limitNoMaximum number of results (1-50)
expandNo(Optional) fields to expand. Examples: 'renderedFields', 'transitions', 'changelog'
fieldsNo(Optional) Comma-separated fields to return in the results. Use '*all' for all fields, or specify individual fields like 'summary,status,assignee,priority'description,updated,reporter,status,summary,assignee,issuetype,priority,created,labels
start_atNoStarting index for pagination (0-based)
projects_filterNo(Optional) Comma-separated list of project keys to filter results by. Overrides the environment variable JIRA_PROJECTS_FILTER if provided.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses pagination info via start_at and limit, but does not explicitly state read-only nature or side effects, which would be helpful for an agent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with Args/Returns sections, but is verbose with repeated examples. It could be more concise while retaining key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (6 params, JQL), the description covers all parameters with examples, and an output schema exists. The agent has sufficient information to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides 100% parameter descriptions, but the description adds significant value with JQL examples and explanations of fields, expand, and projects_filter, exceeding schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Search Jira issues using JQL', specifying the verb (search) and resource (Jira issues). It distinguishes from siblings like jira_get_issue by focusing on query-based search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides extensive JQL examples and parameter customization, implying when to use (for flexible queries). However, it lacks explicit exclusions or comparisons to sibling tools like jira_get_project_issues.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SharkyND/mcp-atlassian'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server