Skip to main content
Glama

jira_get_issue

Retrieve detailed information about a Jira issue, including Epic links and relationships, with configurable fields and comments.

Instructions

Get details of a specific Jira issue including its Epic links and relationship information.

Args: ctx: The FastMCP context. issue_key: Jira issue key. fields: Comma-separated list of fields to return (e.g., 'summary,status,customfield_10010'), a single field as a string (e.g., 'duedate'), '*all' for all fields, or omitted for essentials. expand: Optional fields to expand. comment_limit: Maximum number of comments. properties: Issue properties to return. update_history: Whether to update issue view history.

Returns: JSON string representing the Jira issue object.

Raises: ValueError: If the Jira client is not configured or available.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
expandNo(Optional) Fields to expand. Examples: 'renderedFields' (for rendered content), 'transitions' (for available status transitions), 'changelog' (for history)
fieldsNo(Optional) Comma-separated list of fields to return (e.g., 'summary,status,customfield_10010'). You may also provide a single field as a string (e.g., 'duedate'). Use '*all' for all fields (including custom fields), or omit for essential fields only.description,updated,reporter,status,summary,assignee,issuetype,priority,created,labels
issue_keyYesJira issue key (e.g., 'PROJ-123')
propertiesNo(Optional) A comma-separated list of issue properties to return
comment_limitNoMaximum number of comments to include (0 or null for no comments)
update_historyNoWhether to update the issue view history for the requesting user

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses that update_history parameter modifies view history, raises ValueError for client issues, and returns JSON. Could mention rate limits or other side effects, but it's fairly transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description includes a lengthy Args block that duplicates schema information, making it less concise. Purpose is front-loaded, but the redundant parameter list earns its place only partially.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 100% schema coverage, output schema present, and 6 parameters, the description covers returns, raises, and specific feature (Epic links). Missing mention of custom field support or limitations, but adequate for a retrieval tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description's Args block restates schema but doesn't add new meaning beyond what's in the structured schema. No extra parameter context provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Get details of a specific Jira issue including its Epic links and relationship information,' providing a specific verb and resource. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like jira_search or jira_update_issue.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives (e.g., jira_search for querying, jira_get_project_issues for lists). The description implies usage for individual issues but lacks 'when to use' or 'instead of' statements.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SharkyND/mcp-atlassian'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server