kiwi_get_execution_links

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the behavioral burden. The verb 'List' strongly implies a read-only, non-destructive operation, but the description does not explicitly state that it makes no changes or describe associated behavior such as auth requirements or response structure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence contains only the necessary information and no filler. It is appropriately concise for a simple retrieval tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read-only tool, the description plus the schema provide enough to invoke the tool correctly. The absence of an output schema is a minor gap, but the phrasing 'List external links' sufficiently indicates the general return type.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but there is only one parameter, execution_id. The description connects this to 'a test execution', giving some semantic meaning beyond the raw integer type, though it does not explicitly document execution_id or elaborate on its format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific action ('List') and a specific resource ('external links attached to a test execution'). It clearly distinguishes this from sibling mutation tools like kiwi_add_execution_link and from other retrieval tools such as kiwi_get_execution_comments.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no explicit guidance about when to use this tool over alternatives, nor any exclusions or context. The intended use is only implied by the wording 'List external links attached to a test execution.'

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.