update_landing_page_domain_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate open world hints, but the description does not disclose side effects (e.g., DNS changes) or authorization needs. It states actions but not consequences of verification failure or domain replacement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with a clear, front-loaded structure. No redundant information; every word adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers main use cases (domain replace, verify, both) and references optional parameters. With an output schema present, the description is sufficiently complete for a simple update tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%; the description adds marginal value by clarifying 'replace' and 'refresh' but essentially reiterates the schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update landing page domain settings' and specifies the two actions: replacing custom domain or refreshing verification. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'connect_landing_page_domain' which is about initial connection.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'connect_landing_page_domain'. The description implies usage for updating existing settings but does not provide context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.