Skip to main content
Glama
SelfPy

science-ai-mcp-server

by SelfPy

Related Servers

Alternatives to science-ai-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables searching and analyzing over 560,000 CS/AI/ML research papers with LLM-powered novelty scoring and summaries. Supports literature reviews, trend monitoring, benchmark tracking, and deep research sessions through 23 specialized tools.
      25
      1,192 npm
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to search, analyze, and summarize academic research papers in real-time from arXiv, Semantic Scholar, and PubMed. Provides automatic deduplication, citation analysis, and BibTeX generation across multiple research databases.
      68 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Open scientific knowledge MCP for AI agents. Three profiles: search (15 tools incl. find_evidence, compare_papers, explore_topic), publish (5 tools for direct submission with AI-assisted review), govern (20 tools for proposals, voting, methodology shaping).
      8
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to search and analyze academic papers from multiple sources, fetch metadata and full text, and build structured outputs like literature maps and paper comparisons.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables to turn a research folder into a submission-ready academic paper, with stages for screening, venue selection, drafting, humanization, and final QA. Runs locally without uploading any data.
      21
      -

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: duplicate checking, research gaps, journal recommendations, paper pre-check, expert review, and writer pipeline status/start. No significant overlap, and tools like check_duplicate_publication and pre_check_paper serve different aspects of pre-submission.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores (e.g., check_duplicate_publication, find_research_gaps, start_writer_pipeline). Even hakem_review_paper integrates a proper noun but still follows the same structure. No mixing of styles or conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    7 tools is well-scoped for an academic research workflow server, covering pre-submission checks, gap analysis, journal recommendations, review, and writing pipeline. Not too few to be trivial, nor too many to be overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the main pre-submission and review stages comprehensively, but lacks tools for editing, submitting, or tracking submissions beyond the writer pipeline. Minor gaps exist, such as no cancel or update for the pipeline, but core workflows are well-represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues