Skip to main content
Glama
SebastianBaltes

Computer Use MCP Server

by SebastianBaltes
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Computer Use MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • linux-computer-use

      tak-uukti
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control Linux/X11 desktops by providing tools for taking screenshots, clicking, typing, and managing windows via AT-SPI and xdotool.
      3
      MIT

    • claude-linux-mcp

      LukeLamb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Give Claude Desktop full desktop control on Linux/X11: screenshot, mouse, keyboard, windows, clipboard, app launch. Zero-dependency MCP extension, MIT-licensed.
      15
      MIT

    • Harness

      rotcev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to see and control an existing Linux X11 desktop over SSH by taking screenshots and performing mouse, scroll, typing, and keyboard-shortcut actions across browsers, terminals, file managers, and other apps.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action (click, double-click, triple-click, drag, scroll, key press, type, etc.) with clear descriptions, avoiding overlap. The only potential confusion among click variants is resolved by explicit naming.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the 'computer_<action>_<target>' pattern (e.g., computer_left_click_drag, computer_mouse_move). No mixing of naming conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    16 tools is well-scoped for a computer control server, covering essential mouse, keyboard, screenshot, and zoom operations without being excessive or sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers core GUI automation operations thoroughly, but lacks clipboard access or system-level actions (e.g., opening applications). Minor gap for advanced workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources