snap_remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false; the description adds the meaningful behavioral detail 'Megerositest ker' (asks for confirmation) and states that the output is the removal result. There is no contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, front-loaded with the purpose, and organized into Args/Returns sections with no filler. It loses a point only because the type name 'AptPackagesInput' is reused for a Snap operation and could introduce mild confusion.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive tool with strong annotations and a schema that documents host and response_format, the description conveys the essential behavior: removal, confirmation, and returned output. It could add explicit alternative tool guidance, but the missing pieces are minor.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description lists the nested fields packages, host, and response_format but adds no meaning beyond the schema, whose $defs already describes host and response_format and gives packages a brief description. This is adequate because the schema carries the parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action and resource: 'Snap csomag eltavolitasa' (removing a Snap package). It is clear enough to distinguish from apt_remove/snap_install, though it does not explicitly name those siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when snap_remove should be preferred over apt_remove, or that snap_install is the inverse operation. The only implicit signal is the 'Snap' wording, so the agent must infer the appropriate context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.