Impact-ranked replication targets in a research field.

Returns high-impact OpenAIRE papers worth replicating, each flagged OPEN (opportunity) or VERIFIED (already checked by a Science Live replication, with the verdict), each with its abstract (markup stripped — read it or extract the paper's atomic claim), plus independent reusable tooling. Keep topic short (2-3 words); OpenAIRE free-text terms are AND-ed.

Reusable method software for replicating a claim — engines NOT authored by the original paper's team (author-disjoint), ranked by reuse signal (code repo + Software Heritage archival + usage), not citations. Pass the original paper's DOI (authors are looked up) and a short topic.

Has this DOI been independently replicated, and did it hold? Returns every Science Live verdict — pulled LIVE from the nanopub network, any signer (author-agnostic) — with the validation status, CiTO relation, the replication's repository, and links to the signed Outcome/CiTO nanopubs. 'open' if not replicated. This is the reliability signal the OpenAIRE Graph structurally cannot hold.

Also returns:

• agreement: how the independent verdicts agree — pattern is one of robustly_validated / validated / contested / refuted, with confirm/partial/ contradicted counts (so you can say how robustly it held, not just that it did).

• claims: the exact FORRT claim(s) that were replicated — each an atomic AIDA statement plus its claim type (descriptive pattern, statistical significance, …).

• the paper's title and abstract (from OpenAIRE, markup stripped), so you can read it or extract/compare the atomic claim yourself.

List every claim the nanopub network holds a Science Live replication verdict for (author-agnostic, network-wide) — the verified-knowledge corpus that overlays the OpenAIRE Graph by DOI. Each entry: doi, distinct verdicts, number of replications.