Replication Radar
Related Servers
Alternatives to Replication Radar
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for discovering, retrieving, citing, and evaluating scientific records from the Zenodo repository.18MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enforces evidence-graded, phase-gated, peer-reviewed research workflows for AI agents to conduct rigorous decision-making.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for verifying academic citations via Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, and CrossRef.128 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for AIRAS, an open-source research automation platform. It provides tools for paper search, retrieval, hypothesis generation, experiment execution, and paper writing, enabling automated or interactive research directly from MCP clients.39MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables local discovery, comparison, evidence-based ranking, reproducible evaluation, versioned catalogs, and recovery for MCP servers.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the OpenAlex scholarly database, providing AI agents with tools to search and retrieve academic works, authors, and institutions via natural language queries.8MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
The six tools split cleanly along a discover/verify/produce axis: radar and find_independent_software are discovery, replication_status and verified_claims are verdict lookups, and replication_template is scaffolding. The two lookalikes are separated correctly by granularity (per-DOI vs network-wide) and by resource (papers vs software only). The main trap is find_dataset, whose name implies a dataset search but which actually only returns handoff instructions to another MCP, which an agent could misread as a functioning search tool.
Three tools use a verb_noun pattern (find_independent_software, find_dataset) intermixed with bare noun phrases (radar, replication_status, replication_template, verified_claims). The bare noun `radar` is especially uninformative next to the rest. Readable overall, but the convention is clearly mixed rather than predictable.
Six tools is a sensible, tight surface for a discover/verify/scaffold workflow. However, find_dataset does not perform its own action (it delegates to another MCP), so one of the six is arguably a stub rather than an earning tool, and much of the descriptive weight is carried by long prompts instead of tool surface.
Discovery, verdict lookup (single and network-wide), and scaffolding are all covered, but the 'produce' half of the loop is entirely a handoff to an external template repo and a fresh agent session — the server itself cannot sign, publish, or submit anything. There is also no way to search or filter the verified-claims corpus (no topic or field query) and no dataset search at all, only an instruction stub.