cleanuparr_reorder_seeding_rules

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description clearly states the action (reorder rules) and the mechanism (sending an orderedIds GUID array), but does not add extra behavioral context beyond the destructiveHint annotation. It does not mention the effect on rule priority or any side effects, but it does not contradict the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the verb, and contains no filler. Every word adds value, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple reorder tool with an output schema and destructive annotation, the description covers the core purpose but omits contextual details such as the scope (per download client) and any notes about the orderedIDs needing to reference existing rules. It is adequate but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate for both parameters. It only describes ordered_ids as a 'GUID array', leaving download_client_id entirely unspecified and failing to explain how the array should be ordered or validated.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Reorder' and identifies the resource as 'rules', which clearly refers to seeding rules given the tool name. It also states the mechanism (orderedIds GUID array), distinguishing it from sibling CRUD operations like create, update, or delete.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternative rules-management operations. It does not mention prerequisites, such as needing to list existing rules to obtain their IDs, or that this reorder is per download_client_id.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.