cleanuparr_get_seeker_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only says 'Get', which aligns with the readOnlyHint=true annotation but adds no additional behavioral context. It does not mention what the configuration contains, whether it is safe to call frequently, or any side effects. With annotations present, the description adds no value beyond the structured data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one sentence, no fluff. It is appropriately sized for a zero-parameter getter, and the information is front-loaded with the verb and object.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters, an output schema, and a read-only annotation, the description is sufficiently complete at a basic level. However, it does not clarify what 'Seeker' refers to or what kind of configuration is returned, which could be helpful for an agent unfamiliar with the domain. The output schema likely covers return details, so the description is adequate but not rich.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so per the rubric the baseline is 4. The description does not need to explain parameter semantics, and there is nothing to add beyond the schema which is already empty.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get Seeker configuration' clearly states the verb ('Get') and the resource ('Seeker configuration'), which is specific enough to distinguish from sibling tools like update_seeker_config or get_queue_cleaner_config. However, it is minimal and does not elaborate on what 'Seeker' refers to, slightly reducing clarity in a broad toolset context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that it is for retrieving the current active config, nor does it reference the sibling update_seeker_config. The usage context is implied by the name but not explicitly stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.