create_short_answer_question

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must bear the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. The description only states 'create' without explaining side effects, permissions, or what happens upon creation (e.g., does it modify state? is it idempotent?). This is insufficient for safe invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at 4 characters, but it is under-specified. Conciseness should not come at the cost of informativeness. The description fails to earn its place by providing any additional value beyond the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters (2 required) with a nested question object and no output schema, the description is severely lacking. It does not explain what the tool returns, how to structure input, or what behavior to expect. The agent is left with minimal guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 75%, which is below the 80% threshold, so the description should compensate. However, it adds no parameter information. The schema itself has detailed parameter descriptions, but the tool's description does not enhance understanding or provide usage context for the parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '创建简答题' translates to 'Create short answer question', which clearly indicates the tool's function. However, it does not differentiate it from sibling tools like create_single_choice_question or create_multiple_choice_question, and the name itself already conveys this information, so the description adds minimal value.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, when not to use it, or references to sibling tools. The description lacks any contextual usage advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.