Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-trial

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for interacting with the GitHub API, enabling AI assistants to query repositories, pull requests, issues, commits, users, and more.
      432 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables analyzing and querying GitHub repositories through the GitHub Chat API, allowing users to index repositories and ask questions about their code, architecture and tech stack.
      2
      90
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that exposes GitHub user profiles, repository info, and search via tools for AI assistants like Claude.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI assistants to look up and analyze GitHub repositories, including stars, forks, description, open issues, and README content.
      2
      47 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A custom MCP server that lets AI assistants interact with GitHub accounts, offering tools for repository creation, file viewing, code search, and issue management.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    get_repo and recent_commits are clearly distinct: one fetches repository metadata, the other lists recent commit messages. There is no ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Both names use snake_case but follow different patterns: get_repo uses a verb_noun construction while recent_commits is an adjective_noun phrase. The inconsistency is minor but noticeable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a GitHub-related purpose. It is slightly under the typical well-scoped range, though acceptable for a narrow read-only trial.

    Completeness2/5

    The tools only cover repository metadata and recent commits. Obvious gaps like branches, issues, pull requests, and other common repository operations are missing, which would significantly hinder agents needing broader repo access.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues