Skip to main content
Glama
SWITCHSCIENCE

mcp-micropython-bridge

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-micropython-bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets LLMs talk to serial devices: microcontrollers, routers, modems, embedded Linux, anything with a UART.
      23
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for seamless integration with peripheral devices connected to your computer. Control, monitor, and manage hardware devices through a unified API.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables full control of a Flipper Zero device over USB, including screenshots, radio protocols, and app development without requiring a COM port.
      35
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Modular MCP server for interacting with a Flipper Zero from MCP-capable clients (including Claude Desktop). Supports system info, BadUSB scripts, and music playback over USB or WiFi.
      31
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A headless MCP server that enables AI tools (like Claude Code) to read and analyze serial logs from embedded boards (ESP32, STM32) for firmware debugging, with read-only tools for log retrieval and a built-in web viewer.
      6
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource and action, with clear separation between file reads, uploads, downloads, stream reads, and directory operations. A few pairs such as eval vs exec and read_file vs download_file require reading descriptions, but boundaries are still understandable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use the same micropython_ prefix and snake_case verb_noun style, making the set predictable and easy to scan.

    Tool Count3/5

    29 tools is heavy for this server, and several convenience operations around file reading and streaming could likely be consolidated. The breadth is justifiable for a MicroPython bridge, but the count sits at the borderline of being excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers connection lifecycle, execution, reset/interrupt, file CRUD, directory operations, transfers, hashing/comparison, and stream reading. Minor gaps such as recursive directory deletion or on-device copy remain, but core workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues