Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to whatbox-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A unified MCP server with composable tools for GitHub operations, file management, shell execution, kanban boards, Discord messaging, and package management. Features role-based security, HTTP/stdio transports, and a web-based development UI.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server exposing narrowly scoped storage workflows with Overseer approval integration and redacted execution evidence, currently in fixture-only development for testing via stdio.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A safety-first MCP server enabling file inspection/editing, allowlisted command execution, process listing, and optional desktop automation. It emphasizes security with disabled writes/commands/GUI by default and local feature gates.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A lightweight, self-hosted MCP server that provides a small set of administration tools for a single Minecraft Java Edition server, including whitelist management, broadcasting, kicking, backups, and monitoring, with secure RCON-based operations and audit logging.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A safe, structured MCP server that lets AI inspect and operate a VPS through typed, allowlisted tools for nginx, PM2, SSL, UFW, fail2ban, with read-only defaults and opt-in mutations.
      6
      14 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 30 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several status/inspection tools have overlapping scopes (e.g., whatbox_services_status, whatbox_operational_snapshot, whatbox_configuration_status, whatbox_website_diagnostics) which could cause an agent to pick the wrong one. Descriptions help but boundaries are not crisp, especially between configuration_status and configuration_review.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Most tools use a whatbox_ prefix but a few do not (server_info, list_capabilities), and naming patterns vary between verb-first (whatbox_list_directory) and noun-first (whatbox_website_readiness, whatbox_services_status). This mixed convention makes the API harder to predict.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 30 tools, the server is well beyond the typical 3-15 range. While the domain covers multiple subsystems, the sheer number creates navigation overhead and suggests several status/read-only tools could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The suite covers core file operations, quarantine, torrents, website deployment, services, backup, and connection checks. Missing a direct file deletion (only quarantine/purge) and some status tools are redundant, but the main lifecycle workflows are well represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues