Skip to main content
Glama
SEOSiri-Official

Biometric IoT Bridge MCP

by SEOSiri-Official
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python

Related Servers

Alternatives to Biometric IoT Bridge MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • AIoT MCP Server by emqx

      AIoT MCP Serverofficial

      emqx
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for AI agents to discover and control IoT devices through MQTT, using the AIoT Agent Network Protocol for device registration and communication.
      3
      1
      -

    • uMCP

      ramsestein
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a privacy-preserving security framework for AI agents using the Model Context Protocol, enabling transparent anonymization of sensitive data and blockchain-like audit trails for regulated domains.
      MIT

    • MQTT MCP Server

      ezhuk
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to securely monitor and control MQTT devices for building automation, industrial control, and smart home systems through a standardized MCP interface.
      22
      MIT

    • Secure MCP-gRPC

      mstanton
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a secure gRPC transport layer for the Model Context Protocol (MCP) with mutual TLS, token-based authentication, and fine-grained authorization. Includes comprehensive telemetry and a real-time visualization dashboard for monitoring AI model interactions and security events.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clear and distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (check_active_authorizations) and is consistent since there are no other tools to compare.

    Tool Count2/5

    The server name suggests a comprehensive Biometric IoT Bridge, but only one tool is provided. This is far too few tools to cover the intended domain, leaving the server underpowered.

    Completeness1/5

    The server lacks essential operations for managing authorizations (e.g., create, revoke, list all). The single check tool is insufficient for any real workflow, resulting in severe incompleteness.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources