MCP Ahrefs
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Ahrefs
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the Ahrefs API v3 that provides live SEO data including keyword research, SERP analysis, backlink profiles, and domain authority to MCP clients like Claude.16MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP hosts to access 22 SEO Intellect API tools, handling task submission, polling, and retrieval for SEO analysis workflows.22MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides SEO audits, content analysis, and domain overviews through an MCP server, including on-page, technical, and authority metrics with built-in browser rendering and anti-bot handling.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides SEO automation with tools for keyword research, SERP analysis, and competitor analysis through Google Ads API integration, enabling AI assistants to access these capabilities via MCP.50-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides a standardized interface for interacting with Ahrefs's tools and services through a unified API.8MIT
- FlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceStandalone MCP server for the Mangools API with 82 tools covering keyword research, SERP analysis, rank tracking, backlinks, competitor research, and AI search visibility. Enables natural language interaction with Mangools SEO capabilities.82-
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Multiple tools have overlapping computational purposes that could cause confusion. calculate_fibonacci and simulate_heavy_computation both perform intensive calculations, while process_batch_data and simulate_heavy_computation both offer parallelized processing. The echo_tool and get_time are distinct but the computational tools lack clear boundaries.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (calculate_fibonacci, echo_tool, get_time, process_batch_data, random_number, simulate_heavy_computation). The only minor deviation is 'echo_tool' using 'tool' as a suffix while others don't, but overall the naming is quite predictable.
With 6 tools, the count is reasonable for a utility server, but feels borderline thin for a server named 'MCP Ahrefs' which suggests SEO/web analytics functionality. These generic utility tools don't align well with the implied domain, making the count feel mismatched to the server name.
For a server named 'MCP Ahrefs' (implying SEO/backlink analytics), there are significant gaps - no tools for domain analysis, backlink checking, keyword research, or any actual Ahrefs-like functionality. As a generic utility set, it lacks coherent coverage of any specific domain, making it incomplete for any focused purpose.