github-repo-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| GITHUB_TOKEN | No | Your GitHub personal access token for higher rate limits |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| getRepoAllDirectoriesD | – |
| getRepoDirectoriesD | – |
| getRepoFileD | – |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The tools have overlapping purposes with unclear boundaries: getRepoAllDirectories and getRepoDirectories appear to serve similar directory-related functions without descriptions to clarify their differences, while getRepoFile is distinct but the directory tools are ambiguous. This overlap will likely cause misselection between the two directory tools.
The naming follows a consistent camelCase pattern (getRepoAllDirectories, getRepoDirectories, getRepoFile) with a clear verb_noun structure, though the lack of descriptions makes it harder to assess intent. There are no deviations in style, but the similarity in names for the directory tools slightly reduces clarity.
With only 3 tools, this server feels thin for a GitHub repository domain, as it lacks essential operations like create, update, delete, or search. The limited scope suggests incomplete coverage, making it difficult for agents to perform comprehensive repository management tasks.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a GitHub repository server: it only includes retrieval tools for directories and files, missing core CRUD operations (e.g., create repo, update files, delete items), search functionality, and lifecycle management. This will cause significant agent failures in handling typical repository workflows.