github-repo-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to github-repo-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server that enables interaction with GitHub repositories, issues, pull requests, and search functionality through natural language.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA server-side implementation that handles context processing between GitHub repositories and AI models, enabling seamless integration of AI capabilities with codebases through the Model Context Protocol.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server that enables Claude to retrieve and analyze code from GitHub repositories through the uithub API.4 npm21MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides read-only access to GitHub repositories, enabling AI assistants to perform code reviews without write permissions.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that fetches public GitHub repository statistics.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA server that allows AI assistants to browse and read files from specified GitHub repositories, providing access to repository contents via the Model Context Protocol.6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The tools have overlapping purposes with unclear boundaries: getRepoAllDirectories and getRepoDirectories appear to serve similar directory-related functions without descriptions to clarify their differences, while getRepoFile is distinct but the directory tools are ambiguous. This overlap will likely cause misselection between the two directory tools.
The naming follows a consistent camelCase pattern (getRepoAllDirectories, getRepoDirectories, getRepoFile) with a clear verb_noun structure, though the lack of descriptions makes it harder to assess intent. There are no deviations in style, but the similarity in names for the directory tools slightly reduces clarity.
With only 3 tools, this server feels thin for a GitHub repository domain, as it lacks essential operations like create, update, delete, or search. The limited scope suggests incomplete coverage, making it difficult for agents to perform comprehensive repository management tasks.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a GitHub repository server: it only includes retrieval tools for directories and files, missing core CRUD operations (e.g., create repo, update files, delete items), search functionality, and lifecycle management. This will cause significant agent failures in handling typical repository workflows.