TfL MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to TfL MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to access real-time Transport for London data, including tube/bus arrivals, line status, journey planning, and disruptions.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query live Transport for London data, including service status, arrivals, journey planning, bike points, crowding, and fares.1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time access to Transport for London data, enabling users to check tube line statuses, get disruption details, and plan journeys between London locations. Uses the official TfL Unified API to deliver live transport information through AI assistants.310 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time Transport for London journey data, including routes, alerts, and disruptions, allowing AI assistants to search journeys and get station information.120 npm4ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time Transport for London data including line status, journey planning, and disruption information via the TfL Unified API.10 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language queries for Porto Alegre's public transport system, including route planning, stop search, and route information via Claude Desktop or any MCP-compatible client.-
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (line status vs all-line status, bus arrivals vs train arrivals, nearby vs search vs station info). However, get_disruptions, get_planned_works, and get_line_status have some conceptual overlap around service conditions, and search_station vs get_station_info could be confused when resolving station identifiers.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun or verb_noun_qualifier pattern using snake_case, such as get_line_status, get_bus_arrivals, plan_journey, and search_station. There are no mixed conventions or vague standalone verbs.
13 tools is well-scoped for a TfL transport server, covering lines, stations, arrivals, journeys, fares, buses, and disruptions without excessive sprawl. Each tool appears to earn its place.
The surface covers the core read-only TfL workflows: status, disruptions, planned works, station search/info, arrivals, journey planning, fares, and buses. Minor gaps exist, such as detailed line route/stop listings and potential ambiguity around how to obtain station IDs for arrivals, but agents can likely work around them.