Skip to main content
Glama

wikipedia_search_wikipedia

Read-onlyIdempotent

Search Wikipedia for articles matching a query, with configurable result count from 1 to 500.

Instructions

Search Wikipedia for articles matching a query.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesThe search term to look up on Wikipedia.
limitNoMaximum number of results to return (1-500).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYes
resultsNo
statusYes
countNo
languageNo
messageNo
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true, and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is clear. The description adds no extra behavioral context beyond the annotations, making it adequate but not additive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that gets to the point quickly. No wasted words, though it could benefit from slight expansion to address sibling differentiation without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple search functionality and presence of an output schema, the description is minimally sufficient. However, it lacks context for differentiating from many similarly named sibling tools, which impacts completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers both parameters with descriptions, achieving 100% coverage. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool searches Wikipedia for articles matching a query, providing a specific verb and resource. However, it does not distinguish itself from sibling tools like 'search_wikipedia' or 'get_summary', which may cause confusion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or limitations. The one-line description leaves the agent without context for proper selection among many similar siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Rudra-ravi/wikipedia-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server