Skip to main content
Glama
Rudra-ravi

Wikipedia MCP Server

by Rudra-ravi

Related Servers

Alternatives to Wikipedia MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready server that provides Wikipedia search and content retrieval tools through the Model Context Protocol, enabling AI assistants to search for articles, list sections, and retrieve specific content.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives LLMs access to Wikipedia, supporting search, article retrieval, summaries, sections, and related topics across multiple languages and language variants.
      22
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that retrieves and provides Wikipedia content for requested topics, enabling easy access to Wikipedia information directly through the Model Control Protocol.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enhances LLM capabilities by connecting to Wikipedia, internet search (Tavily), and financial data (Yahoo Finance) tools, enabling contextual responses to user queries.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to search, summarize, and retrieve detailed information from Wikipedia across multiple languages. It supports automated fact-checking by allowing models to proactively verify factual claims using Wikipedia's database.
      5
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    There are duplicate tools with and without the 'wikipedia_' prefix, causing confusion. Additionally, some tools like get_summary and summarize_article_for_query have overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Two naming conventions are used inconsistently (with and without 'wikipedia_' prefix). While individual verbs like 'get' and 'search' are clear, the duplication breaks consistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    22 tools is slightly high but reasonable for a Wikipedia domain. However, half are duplicates, so the effective count is 11, which is well-scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers search, article retrieval, summaries, sections, links, coordinates, key facts, and related topics. Missing minor features like history or images but adequate for core Wikipedia access.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSlow