get_invoice
Retrieve invoice details by providing its unique identifier.
Instructions
Get an invoice by ID (GUID).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| invoice_id | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Retrieve invoice details by providing its unique identifier.
Get an invoice by ID (GUID).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| invoice_id | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states a read operation. Lacks disclosure of error handling, authentication needs, or behavior on missing ID.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no extraneous words. Efficiently conveys purpose and parameter hint.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple retrieval tool. Output schema exists to document return values. Could mention behavior on not found, but not critical.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds critical meaning: clarifies invoice_id is a GUID. However, no further details on format or source.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clear verb+resource: 'Get an invoice by ID (GUID)'. Specifies the unique identifier format, distinguishing it from list_invoices and other get_ tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implies use when you have an invoice ID, but no explicit guidance on when to use alternatives (e.g., list_invoices) or when not to use this tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RosenAdvertising/rocketmatter-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server