get_note
Retrieve the full content of an Apple Note by providing its title.
Instructions
Get the full content of a note by its name
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | The name/title of the note |
Retrieve the full content of an Apple Note by providing its title.
Get the full content of a note by its name
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | The name/title of the note |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description implies a read-only operation but does not disclose behavioral traits such as errors, authorization needs, or side effects. With no annotations, more detail is warranted.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence conveys the essential purpose concisely with no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is adequate for a simple read operation but lacks details about return format or error handling. No output schema to compensate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The only parameter 'name' already has a description in the schema, so the tool description adds no new meaning. Schema coverage is 100%, baseline score applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'full content of a note', and the identifier 'by its name'. It distinguishes this tool from sibling tools like get_note_by_id and create_note.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. No context about prerequisites or conditions for use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RodriguesJohn/applenotesmcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server