Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Geneva Forecasting MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server powered by Meta's Prophet that enables LLMs to perform time-series forecasting, trend analysis, and predictive modeling on historical data. It provides LLM-friendly statistical summaries, automated business-rule validation, and ready-to-render Chart.js visualizations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates the FAIM time series forecasting SDK with any MCP-compatible AI assistant, enabling AI-powered forecasting capabilities.
      2
      5 npm
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Deterministic time-series statistics for AI agents. This MCP server gives any LLM agent unit-tested statistical tools — anomaly detection, changepoint detection, seasonal decomposition, stationarity/trend tests, data-quality audits, baseline forecasts — with schema-validated structured output and no arbitrary code execution.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants in MCP clients to query real-time market data, inspect portfolio and Web3 wallet balances across brokers, place protected equity/ETF, crypto, forex, options, DeFi swap, and prediction market orders, and run backtests.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants the ability to connect to, query, profile, and monitor data sources — turning any LLM into an interactive data engineering copilot.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The single tool 'forecast' has a clearly defined and distinct purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'forecast' is clear and follows a simple verb pattern appropriate for its function.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is too few for a forecasting server, as it lacks basic operations like data validation, model comparison, or result visualization. This forces all functionality into one complex tool, which is inadequate for the domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The server is severely incomplete for forecasting tasks. It lacks tools for data preprocessing, model evaluation, error analysis, or handling different data formats, which are essential for a comprehensive forecasting workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues